Royal commissions have been set up in Australia for a plethora of reasons, but their primary purpose has been to investigate and offer recommendations on important issues of public concern. Their perceived independence from the government, investigative powers, access to resources, the status of the commissioner(s), and public-facing nature, all mean royal commissions are uniquely placed to address significant issues and achieve high levels of influence. However, not all royal commissions set up to have policy influence succeed in doing so.
This case examines three royal commissions that did succeed in having policy influence, the Aboriginal Land Rights Commission (ALRC), the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission (VBRC), and the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (RCIRCSA), and finds three common strategies used by the commissioner(s) with potential lessons for future royal commissions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.