Chinese temples

The Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration was formally established in 2010 after a workshop held in Brisbane in association with the 2009 National Conference of the Institute of Public Administration (IPAA). Apart from IPAA, ANZSOG, ANU and Griffith University were the original Australian supporters (together with Treasury and DFAT), along with Sun Yat Sen University in Guangzhou, City University in Hong Kong and the National Taiwan University in Taipei. The current principals of the Dialogue are:

  • Honorary Professor Andrew Podger AO, ANU;
  • Professor Hon Chan, City University; Professor Tsai-tsu Su, National Taiwan University;
  • Professor Jun Ma, Sun Yat Sen University; and
  • Professor Meili Niu, Sun Yat Sen University.

Dialogue workshops have been held every year since 2011 at a range of universities across Greater China and at ANU, on public administration issues of shared interest. Workshop themes have been:

The series has allowed increasingly deep understanding of practice in each jurisdictions as well as shared exploration of current issues and challenges. Each workshop has involved scholars from universities across Greater China and Australia, and a selection of practitioners from the different jurisdictions. Amongst the Australian practitioners have been officials from a range of Australian departments and authorities (including PM&C, Treasury, Health Finance, Infrastructure, APSC and ATO), Victoria and NSW and local governments in Victoria and Queensland.

Many presentations at Dialogue workshops have subsequently led to publications in various journals and books, some in symposia that provide comparisons of practice across jurisdictions as well as analysis of particular country developments.

This website aims to provide a one-stop-shop allowing access both to all published papers and to a selection of previously unpublished papers that contain information and analysis of continuing relevance to Australian and Chinese scholars and practitioners. The website contains papers from the workshops up to and including 2018. Papers from 2017 will be added when available.

A special issue of the Australian Journal of Social Issues, based on a 2018 workshop organised by the Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration, is now available for free through the ANZSOG website, thanks to an agreement between ANZSOG and the AJSI.

The issue covers urban governance issues across the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia and compares policies and practice across the jurisdictions. The papers stem from a workshop held in Shanghai in September 2018, including academics and former practitioners across a range of universities in Australia, the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan.

The AJSI special issue will be available free until February 2021. As well as an introduction by Professor Andrew Podger the journal includes the following articles:

  • The immense and continuing challenge of urban governance: Developments in Australia and across Greater China by Andrew Podger, Michael Woods and Tsai‐tsu Su
  • A new tool for urban governance or just rhetoric? The case of participatory budgeting in Taipei City by Nai‐Ling Kuo, Ting‐Yu Chen, Tsai‐Tsu Su
  • Financing urban growth in China: A case study of Guangzhou by Meili Niu and Yan Wu
  • Are good governance principles institutionalised with policy transfer? An examination of public–private partnerships policy promotion in China by Cheng Chen and Caixia Man
  • Strengthening urban community governance through geographical information systems and participation: An evaluation of my Google Map and service coordination by Helen K. Liu, Mei Jen Hung, Lik Hang Tse, Daniel Saggau
  • Australia’s national urban policy: The smart cities agenda in perspective by Richard Hu
  • Telecommunications infrastructure in Australia by Andrew Madsen and Michael de Percy


This journal issue was published following  the first Greater China Australia Dialogue workshop, held at Sun Yat-sen University in 2011 on the topic of ‘Putting Citizens at the Centre: Making Government More Responsive’. This topic was chosen in response to growing international interest in citizen-focused public services, acknowledging that this concept has different meanings in different concepts. The editors offer an introduction of the topic before giving an overview of the articles included in the issue:

  • Jun Ma, The Rise of Social Accountability in China
  • Yan Wu, Does Participatory Budgeting Improve the Legitimacy of the Local Government?: A Comparative Case Study of Two Cities in China
  • Jie Gao, How Does Chinese Local Government Respond to Citizen Satisfaction Surveys? A Case Study of Foshan City
  • Guang Zhang, Citizen Expectations and Improvement of Government Functions: A Study of Importance and Performance of Budgetary Demands in China
  • Nai-Ling Kuo, Citizen Dissatisfaction Leads to Budget Cuts, or Not: A Case Study of Local Taiwanese Government
  • Colin Bridge, Citizen Centric Service in the Australian Department of Human Services: The Department’s Experience in Engaging the Community in Co-design of Government Service Delivery and Developments in E-Government Services
  • Kinglun Ngok, Serving Migrant Workers: A Challenging Public Service Issue in China
  • Yapeng Zhu, Policy Entrepreneur, Civic Engagement and Local Policy Innovation in China: Housing Monetarisation Reform in Guizhou Province
  • Bennis Wai Yip So, Learning as a Key to Citizen-centred Performance Improvement: A Comparison between the Health Service Centre and the Household Registration Office in Taipei City
  • Anthony Housego and Terry O’Brien, Delivery of Public Services by Non-Government Organisations
  • Zhibin Zhang, Advocacy by Chinese Nonprofit Organisations: Towards a Responsive Government?
  • Yijia Jing, Managed Social Innovation: The Case of Government-Sponsored Venture Philanthropy in Shanghai
  • Mei Jen Hung, Building Citizen-centred E-government in Taiwan: Problems and Prospects


This journal issue was published following the second Greater China Australia Dialogue workshop, held in 2012, exploring current practices and challenges in allowing a degree of local autonomy within national public policy frameworks in China, Taiwan and Australia. Arrangements across the three countries are variable and often significant, and this issue aims to capture details relating to each context. The editors offer an introduction of the topic before giving an overview of the articles included in the issue:

  • Andrew Podger, Public Administration in China and Australia: Different Worlds but Similar Challenges
  • Alan Fenna, Dilemmas of Federalism and the Dynamics of the Australian Case
  • John Phillimore, Understanding Intergovernmental Relations: Key Features and Trends
  • Jianxing Yu and Xiang Gao, Redefining Decentralization: Devolution of Administrative Authority to County Governments in Zhejiang Province
  • Meili Niu, Fiscal Decentralization in China Revisited
  • Guang Zhang, The Impacts of Intergovernmental Transfers on Local Governments’ Fiscal Behavior in China: A Cross-County Analysis
  • Jun Ma, Hidden Fiscal Risks in Local China
  • Fangzhi Ye, Determinants of Land Finance in China: A Study Based on Provincial-level Panel Data
  • Peter Robinson and Tess Farrelly, The Evolution of Australia’s Intergovernmental Financial Relations Framework
  • John Spasovejic, Fiscal Equalisation in Australia
  • Nai-Ling Kuo and Bennis Wai Yip So, Pursuing Revenue Autonomy or Playing Politics? Fiscal Behaviour of Local Governments in Taiwan
  • Kinglun Ngok, The Recent Social Policy Expansion and Its Implications for Inter-governmental Financial Relations in China
  • Alfred Tat-Kei Ho and Tao Lang, Analyzing Social Safety Net and Employment Assistance Spending in Chinese Cities
  • Mary Ann O’Loughlin, Accountability and Reforms to Australia’s Federal Financial Relations
  • Jennifer Menzies, Reducing Tensions in Australian Intergovernmental Relations through Institutional Innovation
Download: pdf 2013 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration Workshop: Public Sector Human Resources Management (285 KB) The 2013 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop held at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou focused on public sector human resources management. Approaches towards HRM in the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia are very different, and even measuring the size of the public sector workforce for the purposes of comparisons proved to be a challenge. This document provides an overview of background papers and articles relating to the Dialogue workshop, studying each of the three jurisdiction.
Download: pdf The APS and the Chinese Civil Service (1.44 MB) This research serves as a background paper to the 2013 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop, and describes the Chinese Civil Service in terms of its administrative tradition and current institutional arrangements. Providing an overview of the principles of the Chinese civil service, Dr Derek Drinkwater argues that this knowledge is crucial for APS employees to proceed with security and trade policy debates in Australia’s relations with China. The paper argues that knowledge of two key elements of Chinese polity is necessary to comprehensively understand China as a nation and its civil service: 1) the administrative tradition which shapes Chinese public administration; and 2) the structure of China’s civil service and the categories and responsibilities of its civil servants.
Download: pdf The Concept of ‘Merit’ in Australia, China and Taiwan (993 KB) Professors Andrew Podger and Hon Chan provide a description of approaches to ‘merit’ in Australia, China and Taiwan. A detailed overview of the merit principle in Australia is given, with reference to key debates around the role of women, treatment of ex-servicemen, importance of graduate recruitment, equal employment opportunity, and staff perceptions of fairness and the application of merit in employment decisions. Podger and Chan acknowledge that merit is applied differently in China and Taiwan, and that all three jurisdictions have differing definitions of merit.
Download: pdf Crowding Out Meritocracy? – Cultural Constraints in Chinese Public Human Resources Management (292 KB) This paper discusses compromises to the development of a meritocracy-based civil service system in China, but seeks especially to analyse the underlying cultural forces to explain pervasive norm violations, especially at local levels. Dr Zhibin Zhang argues that cultural explanations have been under-examined. This paper uses 14 case studies to demonstrate that Chinese civil service institutions, derived from a culture of hierarchical collectivism, failed to address the cultural constraints over implementation of the meritocracy principle.
Download: pdf Public Employees’ Perceived Promotion Channels in Local China: Merit-based or Guanxi-oriented? (158 KB) Liang Ma, Huangfeng Tang and Bo Yan examine perceptions of the roles played by merit and guanxi (personal ties) in promotions through the Chinese Civil Service. It outlines the characteristics and complexities of cadre personnel management, and emphasises the prevalence of guanxi in Chinese society that cannot be escaped by the civil service. The paper adopts a configurational approach to classify perceptions of reasons for promotion into four groups: merit-based, guanxi-oriented, ambidextrous (both) and fatalistic (neither) and how groups of employees perceive and assess the fairness of promotion in this light.
Download: pdf Party Management of Talent: Building a Party-led, Merit-based Talent Market in China (203 KB) Lijun Chen et al examine the establishment of a party-led merit-based talent management system to deal with a talent deficit in China during the reform-era. The article then assesses the effectiveness of these measures and national and local levels. The article demonstrates that merit principles have been given increasing priority over three decades to revamp the traditional cadre personnel management system without compromising political boundaries or the one-party state system of pots-Mao China. Its study attempts to address key questions:What has driven Chinese leaders to initiate and advocate policy changes?What measures do they use?How effective are the measures in addressing the talent problems Chinese leaders face?What lessons can Western readers learn from China’s experience of talent management?
Download: pdf Exam-centred Meritocracy in Taiwan: Hiring by Merit or Examination? (105 KB) Bennis Wai Yip So examines the role of the civil service entrance examination (CSEE) as the primary measure of merit in recruitment to the Taiwanese civil service. The article assesses ‘hiring by examination’ against definitions of merit, and demonstrates that while the examinations are perceived as essential to procedural fairness – accessible to all and prioritised by score – ‘fitness to do the job’ is compromised by the removal of public managers from recruitment. The paper outlines the history of examinations in Taiwan and Asia more broadly, and explains its continued confidence in the system while other nations diverged to new merit principles.
Download: pdf The Leader’s Role in Learning and Development (697 KB) Leanne Ansell-McBride outlines leadership development programs in the Victorian public service, as led by the Victoria Leadership Development Centre (VLDC). The article presents findings as to best practice in leadership development, identifying five practices that have that had the greatest impact on the success of leadership development efforts. Ansell-McBride also explores the role of leaders in assessing and developing executive leadership capability, what the ‘70/20/10 rule of development’ looks like in practice, and how to measure and evaluate leadership success based on the outcomes the VLDC program.
Download: pdf Development of the Senior Executive Service in Australia (320 KB) John Halligan gives a historical overview of the Senior Executive Service (SES) in Australia, comparing it to international (mostly Anglophone) counterparts. This article argues that public service leadership is a product of its administrative culture and context, and examines the Australian SES through key eras including managerialism, new public management and new public governance. Halligan analyses both the creation and development of the senior public service, and addresses leadership development within the service up until the establishment of The Strategic Centre for Leadership, Learning and Development in 2010. Halligan’s analysis finds that the early SES was relatively successful compared to international counterparts, but that service and leadership objectives are dependent on their context, with original objectives unevenly realized over time.
Download: pdf Capability Reviews of Australian Government Departments 2010-2013 (216 KB) This article describes and assesses the development of systematic capability reviews of individual departments of the Australian Public Service, as at the time of writing. Jeff Harmer and Andrew Podger offer an overview of review components, including its key definitions, questions and methodologies, and also briefly summarise findings as at October 2013. The paper then comments on the methodology and process of the review, pointing out certain strengths and inconsistencies, though acknowledging that the review is still underway.
Download: pdf Individual, Team and Organizational Development in the Victorian Public Service (199 KB) Geraldine Kennett discusses training and development models in relation to organizational capability and team development, and not just individual development. The Victorian Public Service (VPS) is used as a case study, analysing data across six divisions in three VPS departments, and determines preferred training and development approaches according to certain organisational and individual needs. Kennett uses this data to inform employers of the most suitable training and development strategies most appropriate to their varying organisational settings.
Download: pdf Performance management of teachers (475 KB) Greg Murtough and Mike Woods respond to the 2012 Productivity Commission analysis of performance management in Australian schools, which found that feedback and support, as well as disciplinary action and dismissal, were lacking in teacher performance management. Part of the Commission’s recommendations included improving the quality of teacher performance management, and this paper explores survey findings of the various components and areas of concern as raised by interested parties. The paper argues that school principals need to be given more authority to address under-performance, and that performance bonuses are unlikely to lead to meaningful teacher performance improvement in the foreseeable future.
Download: pdf Australian Experience with HRM Devolution (726 KB) Andrew Podger explores HRM Devolution in Australia, one of the key elements of the New Public Management movement of the 1980s and 1990s, as a means for improving performance. The article gives an overview of the history of devolution in the Australian public services, and discusses its impact on various aspects human resources management. The article argues that while devolution has increased flexibility for agency heads on employment matters, other problems surrounding the devolution of pay and classifications have arisen and proven difficult to resolve. These problems include constrained mobility within the public service, administrative overload and feelings of unfairness amongst employees with different pay conditions for the same work. The article tracks these benefits and problems since the introduction of NPM in Australia, through the 1980s-90s and up to 2013.
Download: pdf Pay, recognition, trust and employee outcomes in the Australian Public Service: direct and indirect effects (594 KB) Jeannette Taylor analyses responses from the Australian Public Service Commission’s 2010 State of the Service Employment Survey to determine the effectiveness of financial and non-financial rewards to raise organizational commitment and reduce turnover intention. Taylor hypothesizes that organizational commitment is based on reciprocity, and that employees are likely to commit in exchange for their interests being looked after by the organization. Taylor examines this hypothesis against both pay and recognition, finding positive correlation between each and organizational commitment, and increasing employee trust in the performance management system. Taylor discusses the implications of her findings for public human resources managers, not only in increasing job satisfaction but in meeting employee perceptions of fairness and building organisational trust.
Download: pdf Assessing Agency-Level Performance Evaluation Reform in China: Can It Truly Serve as a Management Innovation? (841 KB) Lin Ye and Xing Ni fill a gap in performance management studies to focus on agency-level reforms in China. In this article, they analyse a new performance management regime established by the Hainan Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DoFHP) and assess its success. They find that performance goals can be achieved by strengthening the linkage between individual and organizational performance, enhancing organizational capacity of performance evaluation, and improving functional control by introducing advanced evaluation measures. For DoFHP, ample financial resources aided the development of a sophisticated performance management system, with experts assisting (from the World Bank) in improving performance evaluation and managerial efficiency. The paper assesses the system against the criteria of validity, legitimacy, credibility, functionality and accessibility, and finds positive outcomes for performance management, though with room for improvement.
Download: pdf Policy Expectations Moderates the Relationship Between Merit Pay Policy Effectiveness and Public Service Motivation (91 KB) Fanrong Meng and Jiannan Wu explored the relationship between public service motivation (PSM) and perceived merit pay policy effectiveness among public sector employees in China, and the mediating role of policy expectancy, surveying 581 compulsory school teachers in Guangdong and Shaanxi Provinces. Previous data of merit pay policy for teachers in western countries has led some to question the actual benefits of performance pay programs, and this article tests this in the Chinese context. Meng and Wu test whether PSM is ‘crowded out’ by the use of extrinsic rewards such as merit pay, and the possible impact of expectations about the likely effectiveness merit pay. Their study demonstrates a U-shaped relationship between the perceived effectiveness of merit pay policy and PSM, and that these expectations moderate the relationship.
Download: pdf 2014 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop: Maximising the Benefits of Decentralisation (275 KB) The 2014 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop held at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou focused on the theme of ‘Maximising the Benefits of Decentralisation’. Decentralisation often leads to increased responsiveness to local needs and economic and social benefits, but can also open the door to corruption and mismanagement. The workshop discussed the capabilities required and developed to enhance the effectiveness of decentralization, and discussed and compared developments in Australia, The People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. This paper offers an overview of research contributing to and stemming from this discussion.
Download: pdf Decentralisation of Public Administration: an introductory overview (436 KB) This article serves as a background paper to the 2014 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop, providing a theoretical background to decentralization. Mike Woods and John Wanna distinguish between ‘devolution’ and ‘decentralisation’ and describe those factors that determine how a country may distribute powers, both in unitary states and federations. The paper discusses the principles sometimes used to support devolution or decentralization – subsidiarity, differentiation and experimentation, and the adequacy of local capability – and how these principles are affected by the powers and functions involved. Woods and Wanna summarise these principles and theories with respect to the Australian and Chinese contexts and then identify key areas for discussion to determine how the benefits of decentralization may be maximized for each country.

Download: pdf Rediscovering Intergovernmental Relations at the Local Level: The Devolution to Township Governments in Zhejiang Province (365 KB)

Jianxing Yu, Lin Li and Yongdong Shen add to existing discourse that focuses and vertical relations between the central government and provincial governments of China by exploring the less-researched decentralization reform to townships. In this article, they describe this reform in Zhejiang province, now a model for the rest of the PRC. They provide an overview of the challenges of devolution to township governments, including a brief historical overview of reforms since 1978. In particular, the authors acknowledge challenges surrounding capability and ensuring accountability. They describe the four rounds of reform for the devolution of administrative power from county-level to township governments in Zhejiang and the remarkable gains the province has reaped as a result, but also acknowledge that there is some way to go before townships can confidently exercise their flexibilities within clear policy frameworks.

Download: pdf The Civil Service System in Taiwan (slides) (801 KB)

In a presentation to the 2014 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop, ‘Maximising the Benefits of Decentralisation’, Tsai-tsu Su presented these slides on the Taiwanese Civil Service system. She gives a statistical overview of the civil service workforce and describes a decline in bureaucratic capacity, before elaborating on various challenges facing Taiwanese public administration and further efforts to decentralise.

Download: pdf Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central-Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China (406 KB) Xufeng Zhu and Hui Zhao discuss China’s application of ‘experimentalist governance’ to build national policies by pilot testing policies at the local level. The authors present a theoretical framework to experimental governance and describe China’s approach through case studies on four pension policies. National policies may diversely impact local regions, and thus national policies are tested and evaluated at the local level before being used to inform the development of a national approach. The central government relies on strong interaction with local governments to enact successful national policies by assessing the success of local experiments, as seen in the pensions case. As such, the central government is able to learn from local experiments, develop national programs and synthesize appropriate local policy instruments, and the authors demonstrate the potential benefits of the experimental governance approach both in China and internationally.
Download: pdf Area-based competition and awards as a motivation tool for public service provision: The experience of Xining, China (331 KB) Bingqin Li examines the role of area-based competitions (ABCs) as motivators for good public service provision. Li describes the practice of Chinese cities competing to implement national policies where local motivation is lacking, and examines positive (reward) and negative (consequence) incentives used in competitions. Public hygiene is one such policy area lacking in local motivation, while the central government is invested in its improvement. Hygienic City was competition introduced for local governments to meet environmental standards, service sector hygiene and bug control, and Li discusses its effectiveness in the city of Xining, Qinghai Province. Li’s research demonstrates that competition indeed motivated public officials and individuals and private businesses to act, where promotions, local pride, and financial coverage were positive incentives for change. Li also identified costs to competition in Xining and more broadly, in perverse incentives, short-sighted responses, and limited capacity for poor places to respond to targets. This research has broader implications as area-based competitions occur internationally, and are used in China more frequently to motivate city officials to increase public participation, inter-sectoral cooperation, and inter-regional learning.
Access: Kuo and Chun-yuan Wang examines the trend of decentralization in Taiwan where there are still ‘Twilight Zones’ in which central and local government goals and responsibilities conflict, particularly in cases where collaboration is required between the two levels. The authors discuss flood control in Taiwan as an example of this Twilight Zone. After describing the factors of decentralization in general and in flood control, they describe the challenges that may create Twilight Zones in Taiwan and argue that collaborative governance is the key to overcoming ineffective decentralization. Central government needs to provide the resources that can build local government capacity; trust-building across political and local differences helps shape legitimacy of governance and generate commitment; information sharing ensures collective interaction; and integrative, cross-boundary governance fosters communication and coordination both vertically and horizontally between central and local government. The authors acknowledge the increasing importance of decentralization and describe how conflicts of power and responsibility can be mitigated by boosting the administrative and financial capabilities of local government, and the importance of effective collaborative governance where conflict occurs.
Download: pdf Partnership between Government and the Third Sector at a Subnational Level: The experience of an Australian subnational government (156 KB) David Gilchrist summarises his findings from a series of reviews commissioned by the Western Australian Government to evaluate the impact of its policy of Delivering Community Services in Partnership (DCSP). Governments (in Australia and internationally) use the not-for-profit (NFP) sector to deliver much of their social policy, and there is constant tension in the relationship between governments and NFPs. Nevertheless, in Australia there is a desire to improve these relationships for the benefit of the community. The DCSP Policy was established out of this desire, and Gilchrist here describes his evaluations in 2012-14. Amongst the findings is that progress was being made to enhance the capability of non-government organisations to deliver public services, but that further effort was needed; there is a need for ongoing and increased partnership between government and the NFP sector; steps were being taken towards longer-term contract to increase confidence, but that administrative burden remained a problem, with new challenges likely to emerge over time, and that there was still a need for greater consistency across government departments.
Download: pdf Local Government and NGOs in China: Performance-Based Collaboration (665 KB) Yongdong Shen and Jianxing Yu examine the increasing practice by local governments in China to collaborate with NGOs in China’s emerging civil society. This increase has puzzled many observers, due partly to expectations that a growing civil society might oppose the state. Others see this increase as evidence that the state can exercise its strength by means of a strategy of managing or co-opting NGOs. The authors here believe that state-NGO relations occur primarily at the local level, and argue that performance-based decentralization motivates collaboration and determines how local governments and NGOs cooperate. The article gives an overview of the Chinese approach to NGOs and their regulation, and then presents two case studies drawn from Ningbo city and Shanghai city, relating to the provision of home-based care services for the elderly, and the second to an association between an indoor environment products NGO and the government to meet demand for air purification products that would support the modern service and manufacturing industries. The article finds that there is a future for government-NGO cooperation, but that success is dependent upon improved autonomy for NGOs and upon local governments institutionalizing arrangements through more systemic contracting and clarification of respective responsibilities.
Access: book presents a selection of papers developed from the 2015 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration, held at the National Taiwan University in 2015, with the theme ‘Value for Money’. While acknowledging that all governments face resource challenges requiring budgetary management processes, the chapters in this book describe budgeting and financial management in three very different jurisdictions: Australia, China and Taiwan. The editors offer an introduction of the topic before giving a brief overview of each chapter:John Wanna, Government budgeting and the quest for value-for-money outcomes in AustraliaMike Woods, Projecting long-term fiscal outcomesChristine Wong, Budget reform in China: Progress and prospects in the Xi Jinping eraTsai-tsu Su, Public budgeting system in Taiwan: Does it lead to better value for money?Andrew Podger, Making ‘accountability for results’ really work?Meili Niu, Adoption or implementation? Performance measurement in the City of Guangzhou’s Department of EducationHanyu Xiao, Public financial management and the campaign against extravagant position-related consumption in ChinaZahirul Hoque and Des Pearson, Accountability reform, parliamentary oversight and the role of performance audit in AustraliaKai-Hung Fang and Tsai-tsu Su, The development of performance auditing in TaiwanYu-Ying Kuo and Ming Huei Cheng, Budgeting and financial management of public infrastructure: The experience of TaiwanHsin-Fang Tsai, Municipal financial strategy responses to fiscal austerity: The case of TaiwanWendy Jarvie and Trish Mercer, Australia’s employment services, 1998-2012: Using performance monitoring and evaluation to improve value for moneyZaozao Zhao, Case study of the role of third-party evaluators in performance-based budgeting reform at the local government level in ChinaPing Zhang, Zizhou Bu, Youqiang Wang and Yilin Hou, Education outlay, fiscal transfers and interregional funding equity: A county-level analysis of education finance in ChinaHsini Huang and Nailing Kuo, Timely help or icing the cake? Revisiting the effect of public subsidies on private R&D investment in TaiwanAndrew Podger, ‘Value for money’ lessons and challenges
Download: pdf 2016 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop: Improving Public Policy Decision-Making (273 KB) The 2016 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop held at Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou focused on the theme of ‘Improving Public Policy Decision-Making’. This document provides an overview of research presented at the workshop on this theme and the sub-themes explored, including:Institutional adaptations including developments in both the executive and the legislature;External involvement in policy advising;Capability in policy advising; andDevolved implementation, and the relationship between policy design and implementation.
Download: pdf Overview of Australian decision-making processes and challenges (380 KB) John Wanna and Mike Woods give an overview of Australia’s ‘inventive’ public policy. After providing a brief history of public policy-making in Australia – at the national and sub-national levels – they describe the challenges to decision-making today, the channels of policy analysis and formulation, the extensive use and the types of policy reviews in the Australian public policy landscape, and the current state of evidence-based policy. The authors discuss what is particular to the Australian policy environment, and makes some comparisons to China. They conclude by summarizing eight key reasons behind the struggle to embrace evidence-based policy in Australia.
Download: pdf Decision Making and the Australian Cabinet System (875 KB) Bruce Taloni describes the roles and functions of the cabinet in the Australian national government, writing in 2016 when he was the head of the Cabinet Office in the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). After outlining the various rules and fundamental components of Cabinet, he goes on to describe the Cabinet process that, if followed, ideally leads to successful policy implementation and beneficial policy outcomes. Taloni then outlines current and emerging challenges for cabinet, transparency in the Australian system for the monitoring of and commentary on Government and its policies, and finally the role of the Cabinet Division in PM&C. Information and statistics provided are relevant to the time of presentation, in October 2016.
Download: pdf The Changing Demands on Australia’s Health Policymakers: A Case Study on Intergovernmental Relations in Health over 40 years (541 KB) Dr Anne-Marie Boxall provides a detailed overview of the complexities of decision-making in health policy in Australia, particularly in the shared responsibilities between national and state/territory governments. She provides an overview of challenges to healthcare funding, particularly within Australia’s significant vertical fiscal imbalance. After providing a brief historical overview of healthcare agreements from the 1970s onwards, Boxall describes the development of policy for intergovernmental agreements, the political factors affecting agreement negotiations, the centralization of negotiations and the challenge of improving health policymaking. The article concludes by referencing an OECD publication outlining the unique challenges facing health policymakers, including that:Citizens perceive health to be a very high priority;There are many stakeholders intervening in processes between government financing and delivery of health care;There are a wide range of service providers and clinicians operating in highly diverse contexts, andArrangements and institutions vary considerably across and within countries.Boxall also includes possible strategies to help policymakers work together in this complex, intergovernmental system.
Download: document New Approaches to Local Government Innovations in the Xi era (495 KB) In a presentation to the 2016 Greater China Australia Dialogue on Public Administration workshop, ‘Improving Public Policy Decision-Making’, Dr. Jianxing Yu describes new phenomena in local government innovations, here labelled ‘seeking proposal approved’.  Neither ‘pilot’ projects (initiated by upper-level governments to be tested at the local level) nor ‘initiative exploration’ (local governments taking initiative to employ new policy instruments or objectives) can describe this new phenomena, emerging under President Xi. Instead, local governments draft innovative programs, and seek formal approval from higher levels, either implementing policy as a pilot, or dropping the program altogether.
Access: Zhu discusses the inter-regional diffusion of policy innovation in China, which differs from federal models where local governments often implement their own innovative policies independently. In China, vertical and horizontal relations subject local governments to intervention from the central government and/or competition from other local governments in policy innovation. Zhu suggests four models exist based on the extent of vertical and horizontal influences: ‘enlightenment’, ‘championship’, ‘designation’ and ‘recognition’. Zhu describes the degree of central government involvement or local inter-regional competition in each to demonstrate how innovative policies or diffused across China, and uses examples of each model: the participatory budget reform in Wenling City, the administrative licensing system reform in Nankai District, the urban pension pilot schemes for the full funding of the individual account, and the low-carbon pilot scheme.
Download: pdf Can co-production be state-led? Policy pilots in four Chinese cities (386 KB) Bingqin Li and her colleagues discuss experiments in co-production in China, using four cities as case studies: Guiyang, Chengdu, Xiamen (Haicang District) and Taicang. The authors describe co-production and how it is has taken form in China, where it is actively encouraged by the central government to improve ‘self-governance’ at the local level. While grassroots co-production is generally facilitated by the central government, and less so the initiative of community members, the authors argue that this top-down approach has its merits, namely that the central government is well-placed to ignite and sustain co-production, but that there is still some way to go. The authors discuss the various challenges to co-production, including the tension between vertical governance and the horizontal processes required to involve more stakeholders. They also outline the beginnings, activities, promotion, implementation, financing, and social outcomes of co-production in each city. They conclude by describing the conditions required for grassroots co-production through community engagement and how government can initiate co-production.